Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues

Posted by: Sam Sharpe    Tags:  , , , ,     Posted date:  November 4, 2009  |  4 Comments


November 4, 2009


SAM SHARPE

“Sweet Melinda , the peasants call her the goddess of gloom

She speaks good English, and she invites you up into her room

And you’re so kind, and careful not to go to her too soon

And she steals your voice, and leaves you howling at the moon”

~Bob Dylan

In case you haven’t visited the site over the last few days, Elisabeth Rose and Skye have been posting about the “shortcomings” of some men. Modus Operandi here at “love, sex and scandal central” aka metanotherfrog.com decrees that I respond in some manner to the topics, ideas and views presented by these two lovely ladies. However, in the case of The Top 10 Ways… and A Tale of Two Thumbs I had a difficult time coming up with anything worthwhile. Initially, I felt that I didn’t have much to say or much to add.

Having said that, I am very rarely left speechless, so I thought I would just make a few observations:

  1. The 10 points listed in The Top 10 Ways… was compiled with Usain Bolt like quickness. I mean, we all know that size isn’t the only thing that matters, but after bearing witness to women yelling out the myriad warning signs that a given dude is not exactly packing heat, it’s clear it does matter to some extent. And women who care enough about these things clearly would like to have some kind of early warning system—hence the list. (But I’m sure if you’ve got a big dick and the personality of a slug you won’t get much love either—small men of the world rejoice!)
  2. Though tempted to call women like Saffron superficial and insensitive, I think one of the real problems with Mr. Tom Thumb is that he’s sidling up to the high roller’s table with a short stack of chips. Not to be a prick here, but when your money’s short, you bet accordingly. I dunno, maybe I’ve got it all wrong, but fellas, if ya’ got a short stack, leave the $1000 tables alone and play the slots. If you’re so worried about the size of your penis that you refuse to take your pants off, you risk being humiliated like Mr. Two Thumbs.
  3. I’m not a female (or a gay man for that matter) but aside from the size of a penis, don’t you think shape could be just as much of an issue. I once had a girl tell me that the head of her lover’s schlong was “sharp”. When I asked what she meant by “sharp”, she said “y’know, pointy like the tip of a pencil”. Think about that one for a moment.

My advice for my not so Henry Longfellows out there:

Don’t worry about it. I don’t know if there’s any truth to the saying “it’s not the size of the wand, but the magic in it”, but I do know that if you carry yourself in a “small” manner it doesn’t matter how big your cock is, women are going to respond to you negatively. I know I might be contradicting what I just finished saying about men with “short stacks” but any woman who’s going to disregard who you are as a person and dismiss you because of your size, is going to do it regardless of what you do or what you buy. Be confident. Don’t “walk small”. If you believe the size of your manhood is a problem, women will too.


|

About the author

avatar
Sam Sharpe
Lover of fine liquor, music and women...not necessarily in that order.



Related Posts





Wanna say something?






 

CommentLuv badge
4 Comments for Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues

avatar
Philip Docker

I must admit most men who ask this have very small wangers and just want to hear the reassurance that “its not the size but what you do with it” etc. Unfortunately this is a load of bollocks as all women agree that a good big one beats a small one anyday. However all is not lost for you Don as it may be that you are shagging the equivalent of the Mersey Tunnel for its a known fact that women’s wedges vary in size too. For those with small wangers then its not a good idea to shag birds with big wedges (though visa versa is very popular).

Therefore I think the minimum WANGER /WEDGE volume ratio should be 3/2 (due to the elasticity and expansion capability of a wedge).

Wanger/Wedge Volume Cylinder calculation method. Area of Base x Height, which is pi x r^2 x h where pi = 3.14… r = radius of circle / base of cylinder h = height of cylinder).

I suggest that if you adhere to the Wedge/Wanger ratio then all will be hunky dory.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

avatar
Skye Blue

Mr. Docker it’s 6:06am in the morning and you have me LMAO.

I’m lovin’ the WANGER/WEDGE volume ratio and the necessary calculation. But more importantly I think I love you.

Keep the comments coming.

p.s. Please give Don and the Mercy Tunnel my well wishes for a climatic future despite their ‘little’ problem.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

avatar
Sam Sharpe

Mr. Docker, I thank you for the best laugh I’ve had in weeks….

The WANGER/WEDGE ratio is genius (although you later refer to it as the WEDGE/WANGER ratio…which is it….we require a little consistency)……

Two questions…First, does your equation consider the potential impact that the varying depths of a woman’s, shall we say “canal” have on the WANGER/WEDGE ratio?

And just who is this Don you speak of?

Anyway, I second my esteemed colleague’s (that would be you Skye) statements…keep the comments coming……

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

avatar
Philip Docker

Well I have to confess that I did cut and paste the answer from something I wrote on Rucku some time ago in answer to a question from some chap called Don (obviously a size challenged Canadian though I didnt know it at the time). I guess the Wanger/Wedge ratio refers principally to girth which kind of implies a certain length unless of course the unfortunate chap has a willy the shape of a cut off tree stump. Incidentally the Mersey Tunnel is in Liverpool and you kind of hope as a man not to encounter too many wedges like these, especially if you are Canadian. (though I guess you could also stick your head in and play echo.)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0